• Region
    • Pakistan
    • UAE
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Qatar
    • Bahrain
    • Oman
    • Kuwait
  • About
  • Press Kit
  • Media Pack
  • Contact
Wednesday, July 2, 2025
CEO Times
No Result
View All Result
Subscribe
  • Login
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Startup News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • MagazineSEP 2024
  • Databank
  • Podcasts
  • Connect
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Startup News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • MagazineSEP 2024
  • Databank
  • Podcasts
  • Connect
CEO Times
No Result
View All Result
Home Sector Retail & Consumer

FBR exposes systematic tax fraud by Metro Shoes

13 June 2023
in Government, Retail & Consumer
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0
Metro Shoes

The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has found systematic tax evasion by Metro Shoes, one of the largest brands in the country.

A team of the Enforcement Zone of Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU) identified the “electronic sales suppression fraud” during an inquiry into the business in December 2021.

The top tax body also produced an infographic to demonstrate how Metro was masking its true sales with the assistance of the in-house staff of IT professionals.

It indicates the Metro Shoes Head Office (HO) gathered the actual sales data from all retail branches in real-time and transmit only selective transactions to FBR in order to dodge tax.

FBR added that a “phantomware” was constructed by the “in-house IT team of Metro Shoes, and incorporated in the retail POS system branches.”

The tax agency has launched a Point of Sale (POS) Integration system in order to assure digital monitoring/ reporting of every sale.

The corporation was internally utilizing “online sales” and “offline sales” phrases. Online sales were those reported to FBR whereas records of offline sales were not shared with the tax body.

The inquiry revealed that the Metro Shoes Head Office used to give an objective for “online sales and offline sales” to its branches, adding that the sales data going to the HO from retail outlets was segregated and only record of online sales was shared with FBR.

It asserted that the in-house “phantomware” runs on a false algorithm;

If cashier ID = ’36’, then: push transaction to FBR, Print exact invoice #.

If cashier ID ≠ ’36’, then: Don’t push transaction to FBR, Print earlier “36 # transaction”.

The cashiers at specified retail branches punched transactions using “Cashier ID” (36 or non-36) (36 or non-36). While every invoice presented to clients featured a QR code and the associated FBR invoice number (#), the tax regulator pointed out that the phantomware kept on removing offline sales data from branches to limit the chance of fraud discovery.

Source: Pak Observer

Related Posts

SECP Logo

SECP Implements Significant Fee Hikes for Company Document Submissions

23 November 2024
Unilever Pakistan

CCP Imposes PKR 60 Million Fine on Unilever Pakistan for Deceptive Advertising

12 August 2024
Rashid Mahmood Langrial

Rashid Mahmood Langrial Appointed as New Chairman of FBR

9 August 2024
Ahsan Iqbal

Ahsan Iqbal Inaugurates Emerging Technologies Projects under PSDP in Islamabad

9 August 2024
Next Post
umicrofinance and allied bank

U Microfinance Bank enters into strategic partnership with Allied Bank and ABL Asset Management

Copyright © 2024 CEO Times (SMC-Private) Limited

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Sitemap

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Business News
  • Startup News
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Magazine
  • Podcasts
  • About
  • Contact
  • Media Pack

Copyright © 2024 CEO TIMES (SMC-Private) Limited